Markus Holtmannspötter and Laurent Pierot discuss the landmark one-year results of the COATING randomized controlled trial. They analyze how the study data demonstrates that hydrophilic polymer coatings (HPC) show non-inferior safety compared to standard treatments, suggesting a viable alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) by enabling single antiplatelet regimens without increasing thromboembolic risks.
Supported by WallabyPhenox
The primary objective of the COATING trial was to evaluate whether surface modification on flow diverters (such as the P64 MW HPC and P48 HPC) could alter device properties to prevent platelet aggregation. Laurent Pierot explains that the COATING study directly compared a coated flow diverter paired with a single antiplatelet treatment (using prasugrel or ticagrelor) against a standard bare device paired with traditional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).
The newly released one-year follow-up data from the COATING trial demonstrates exceptional non-inferiority and safety:
By focusing on evaluating the coating technology rather than a specific stent design, the COATING trial proves that HPC can be successfully applied across a broad spectrum of neurovascular devices and indications, from carotid stenting to distal flow diversion. Clinically, this allows operators to safely loosen strict DAPT protocols in borderline scenarios. It represents an immediate solution for patients presenting with high hemorrhagic risks, gastrointestinal bleeding histories, or known allergies to aspirin.
Looking ahead, the validated clinical confidence gained from the COATING trial under single antiplatelet regimens opens the door for future prospective research. The next logical frontier for the COATING trial framework will be evaluating efficacy in acute settings, such as ruptured aneurysms requiring flow diversion, where mitigating re-bleeding risks is paramount.