Come and join us across the globe
Sign In

Predictors for etiology of acute LVO

Last update on November 28, 2022

Find out how Dr. Muthugounder Athiyappan Karthikeyan determines etiology prior to procedure to optimize mechanical thrombectomy.

case presentation

All fevers are not the same. The etiology determines the treatment.

Etiology of acute LVO

RBC clot

RBC clot

Fibrin/hard Clot

Fibrin/ hard Clot

ICAD with acute occlusion

ICAD with acute occlusion

Mechanical Thrombectomy technique  

Mechanical thrombectomy technique

aspiration; stent retriever; combination of both

Is there a way to determine etiology prior to procedure to optimize mechanical thrombectomy?

Methodology

  • Retrospective study
  • Inclusion criteria: acute stroke due to LVO treated by mechanical thrombectomy
  • Exclusion criteria: failure to recanalize the target vessel
  • Study period: April 2018 - June 2021
  • Samples studied: 82

 

ICAD-related LVO was diagnosed if the final angiography after mechanical thrombectomy showed fixed focal stenosis or a clear tendency for reocclusion.

Thromboembolic LVO was diagnosed when there was no or minimal stenosis with sufficient blood flow and no tendency to reocclusion after recanalization.

  • Red clot was diagnosed if the retrieved material was predominantly soft and rich in RBC
  • White Clot was diagnosed if the retrieved content was hard and rich in fibrin

 

  • Demographic characteristics, relevant clinical parameters, risk factors, imaging characteristics (MRI), angiographic features, and morphology of retrieved clots were compared between the ICAD-related LVO and thromboembolic LVO
  • Parameters were compared using the Chi-Square/Fisher exact test for non-parametric variables, and t-test used for continuous variables
  • Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the strength of the variable association.

 

Results - Demographics 

Results - Demographic

Results - parameters
Results – Location of LVO

Results – LVO location

Results  - SWI

Results - SWI

A total of 30 clots retrieved during mechanical thrombectomy were studied and compared with SWI blooming on MRI.

Results – Clot Sign (SWI)

Results – Clot sign (SWI)

Results – Length of clot on SWI

Results – Length of clot on SWI

Results – Cut off clot length

Results – Cut off clot length

ROC curve – Clot Length

ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.816 (95 % CI, 0.695–0.904; P = 0.0001)

 

  • SWI Clot length cut off – 9.17 mm (Youden index)
  • Sensitivity of 62.5 % (95 % CI, 35.4–84.8)
  • Specificity of 93.2 % (95 % CI, 81.3-98.6)

Clot length cut off

Results
Results – Watershed infarcts  

Results – Watershed infarcts

Results – Need of adjunct therapy

Results – Need for adjunct therapy

To conclude

Conclusion

Limitations

  • Retrospective study
  • Fixed focal stenosis on final angiogram was diagnosed as ICAD LVO. Theoretically possible to have residual clot or dissection manifesting as focal stenosis
  • clot assessment due to clot loss in suction and failure of retrieval in failed mechanical thrombectomy
  • Clot histopathology not available due to practical limitation

Future direction

  • Apply etiology-specific MT technique and its impact on clinical outcomes
  • IDEAL TIME TO OPTIMISE ETIOLOGY-SPECIFIC MT TECHNIQUE
On the same subject
Come and join us across the globe