Selected in Stroke by RIVERA Rodrigo
Authors: Mistry EA, Mistry AM, Nakawah MO, Chitale RV, James RF, Volpi JJ, Fusco MR
Reference: Stroke. 2017;STROKEAHA.117.017320
Published: July 2017
Mechanical thrombectomy has become one of the main activities in many endovascular centres around the world. Several studies have shown that IV rTPA/Alteplase administration could delay the endovascular process for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion strokes.
In this paper, the authors performed a Meta-Analysis to define if IV thrombolsysis (IVT) previous to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is beneficial in this group of patients. Thirteen studies were included in this revision after selection, with randomised and non-randomised ones.
Results were clearly in favour of MT+ IVT vs MT alone, with better outcome at 3 months, higher success of recanalisation and lesser device passes. Moreover, lower mortality and no increase in ICH.
Despite the results, they should be taken with some precautions, because MT patients were not randomized to IV or controlled. Patients from the MT group were normally assigned because of anticoagulant therapy or delayed presentation, so this could be a reason by itself for worse outcomes.
Data from this Meta-Analysis is in accordance to several guidelines including the one from the AHA (reviewed in 2015). Thus, because of the nature of eligible studies for this analysis, a randomised trial, matching groups of MT with or without IV treatment is needed in the future to clear this point.
Rodrigo Rivera, MD
Instituto de Neurocirugia Dr. Asenjo
The power of clinical evidence
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with occlusion of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery: a meta-analysis
Time for a time window extension: Insights from late presenters in the ESCAPE trial